Midpoint and tangent–chord proofs

Derive midpoint relationships, distinguish alternate segments and build a non-circular proof with a missing-condition counterexample.

More
Reading settingsKeep track of this lesson

Read offline with Premium

Save lessons and their figures on this device to read without an internet connection. Offline saving is included with Premium.

Connect at least once every 30 days to confirm Premium. Topic checks, coaching and sync need a connection.

Find this activity in your course
On this page

Reading settings

Colour theme, text size, line spacing and reading width for your lessons.

Colour theme
Text size
Line spacing
Reading width
Revision Mode

Keep just the revision notes by hiding embedded questions and activities, including worked examples. Your choice follows your account across both subjects and devices. Turn off to show the full lesson again.

Checking Premium access…

Explore Premium

Live preview

Take a moment to read at your own pace. Choose the text size and spacing that feel comfortable for you.

Pause after each idea, then explain it in your own words before moving on.

Narrower lines take effect when the screen has room.

Enlarged diagram

A proof begins with given relationships

A diagram helps locate the objects; its appearance does not establish parallel lines or equal lengths. Begin with the givens, identify corresponding parts and state the reason that makes each next relationship valid. A triangle here has three distinct, non-collinear vertices.

In triangle ABC, M and N are the midpoints of AB and AC. Thus M lies between A and B, N between A and C, and AM/AB = AN/AC = 1/2. The included angle at A is shared, so SAS similarity gives triangles AMN and ABC similar, with A ↔ A, M ↔ B and N ↔ C.

Consequently MN/BC = 1/2 and angle AMN equals angle ABC. Those corresponding-angle equalities imply MN is parallel to BC. This derives the midpoint theorem without using parallelism as a premise. The triangles are similar, rather than congruent: their corresponding lengths have scale factor 1/2 instead of 1.

The converse has its own condition. If a line through midpoint M of AB is parallel to BC and meets AC at N, angle matching makes AMN similar to ABC. Hence AN/AC = AM/AB = 1/2, so N is the midpoint of AC. An arbitrary line through M does not supply those angle equalities and need not bisect AC.

A tangent and chord identify a particular angle

If a tangent touches a circle at A and AB is a chord, the angle between a chosen tangent ray and AB equals the angle standing on chord AB in the alternate segment. Name the tangent direction and the circumference vertex; choosing the opposite direction or other segment changes which supplementary angle is involved.

Use the named rays and vertices. AT and AU are opposite rays on one tangent; C and D are in different segments of chord AB. The stated incidences, rather than measurements of the schematic, determine which theorem applies.

In this configuration, C lies in the alternate segment for angle TAB. If angle TAB is 60°, the tangent–chord theorem gives angle ACB = 60°. A circumference vertex in the other segment needs the supplementary-angle relationship instead of the same equal-angle statement.

The chord is named by its two endpoints A and B. Angle ACB has its vertex at C and arms CA and CB; angle ADB instead has vertex D. Naming the exact three letters prevents the phrase “same chord” from hiding a change of segment.

Check your understanding 1 Check the ray as well as the chord

In the same figure, angle TAB is 60°. Find angle UAB and angle ADB, giving a reason for each. Explain why neither should simply be assigned the value of angle ACB.

Show answer

Angle UAB is 180° − 60° = 120°, because AT and AU are opposite rays on one straight line. Angle ADB is also 120°: it stands on chord AB from the opposite segment to C, so it is supplementary to angle ACB = 60°. The common chord does not make angles in opposite segments equal, and reversing the tangent ray changes its angle with AB.

Keep reasons tied to the exact vertices

For a proof line, name the angles or lengths compared and the condition that permits the theorem. “Angle AMN equals angle ABC, by corresponding angles since MN is parallel to BC” is valid after parallelism is known. The same sentence cannot be the opening justification when parallelism is what must be proved. In the midpoint proof above, similarity supplies the independent angle equality first, then its converse yields parallelism.

“Same angles” alone does not specify a pair or a reason. Similarly, equal-looking sides cannot establish congruence: state an applicable SSS, SAS, ASA/AAS or right-angle–hypotenuse–side criterion with the corresponding parts. SSA alone does not guarantee congruence. Similarity instead requires matching angles or proportional corresponding sides, with the included-angle condition when using SAS.

Check your understanding 2 The scale factor belongs to corresponding sides

M and N are midpoints of AB and AC in triangle ABC. If BC = 14 cm and the area of ABC is 48 cm², find MN, the area of AMN and the area of quadrilateral MBCN, giving reasons.

Show answer

The shared included angle and ratios AM/AB = AN/AC = 1/2 establish SAS similarity. Thus MN = 7 cm. Area scales by (1/2)² = 1/4, so AMN has area 12 cm² and MBCN has area 48 − 12 = 36 cm². Halving area directly would apply a length factor to a two-dimensional quantity.

Do not use the conclusion as a premise

When asked to prove two lines parallel, begin with an independently known equality, similarity or other sufficient condition. A labelled sketch may suggest the result, but the written argument must work for every configuration satisfying its stated givens. Test whether removing a given would break the reasoning rather than treating all nearby facts as interchangeable.

Try it yourself 1

Link the givens into a proof

Minimal support

Problem

Triangle ABC is inscribed in a circle, with AB = AC. AT is tangent at A, with C in the alternate segment for angle TAB. M and N are the midpoints of AB and AC. Prove that AT is parallel to MN, giving reasons for each step. Then decide whether the two midpoint conditions alone would still establish this conclusion if AB = AC were removed; justify your decision.

The equal sides, midpoint positions and tangency are givens. Use them to justify the requested relationship rather than measuring the directions in this schematic.

Write your answer, then compare it with the solution

Hints

Hint 1

Separate the relationships supplied by each group of givens

The midpoint facts relate the small triangle to the whole triangle. The tangent and equal-side facts constrain particular angles at the circumference. Keep the vertex correspondence visible when connecting those relationships.

Show full solution
  1. Establish the direction of MN

    Method

    Compare triangles AMN and ABC from the midpoint conditions.

    Reason

    The two side ratios are 1/2 and the included angle at A is shared.

    Working

    Answer

    SAS similarity gives AMN similar to ABC, hence MN parallel to BC by the corresponding-angle converse. Equivalently, the midpoint theorem can be used directly, with both midpoint conditions stated. Neither argument assumes anything about the tangent.
  2. Establish the tangent's direction independently

    Method

    Connect the isosceles base angles to the named tangent–chord angle.

    Reason

    AB = AC makes angles ABC and ACB equal; the alternate-segment condition identifies angle ACB for chord AB.

    Working

    Answer

    The tangent–chord theorem gives angle TAB = angle ACB. The equal sides give angle ACB = angle ABC, so angle TAB = angle ABC. These are equal alternate interior angles for transversal AB, hence AT is parallel to BC.
  3. Combine the two established directions

    Method

    Use the common parallel direction BC.

    Reason

    Each required parallelism has now been justified from the givens.

    Working

    Answer

    Since MN is parallel to BC and AT is parallel to BC, AT is parallel to MN. The conclusion follows without reading parallelism from the diagram or presuming it in an angle statement.
  4. Test whether the equal-side condition can be omitted

    Method

    Keep the midpoint conditions while changing the inscribed triangle.

    Reason

    Midpoints establish MN parallel to BC, but do not by themselves constrain the tangent’s direction.

    Working

    Answer

    Without AB = AC there is no reason for angles ABC and ACB to be equal. For a counterexample, take an inscribed right-isosceles triangle with AB its diameter and angle ACB = 90°, so angle ABC = 45°. The tangent at A is perpendicular to AB, whereas BC makes 45° with AB. Thus AT is not parallel to BC or to MN, even though M and N are still midpoints. This triangle has AC = BC, rather than AB = AC, so it satisfies exactly the weakened conditions.

Keep track of this lesson

Mark the lesson done when you have worked through it.

Lesson progress is optional and kept on this device.

Your lesson mark records your own study. Checks are kept separately in My Learning.