Composite and implicit series

Combine series through a chosen order, derive local coefficients by repeated differentiation, and verify implicit approximations.

More
Reading settingsKeep track of this lesson

Read offline with Premium

Save lessons and their figures on this device to read without an internet connection. Offline saving is included with Premium.

Connect at least once every 30 days to confirm Premium. Topic checks, coaching and sync need a connection.

Find this activity in your course
On this page

Reading settings

Colour theme, text size, line spacing and reading width for your lessons.

Colour theme
Text size
Line spacing
Reading width
Revision Mode

Keep just the revision notes by hiding embedded questions and activities, including worked examples. Your choice follows your account across both subjects and devices. Turn off to show the full lesson again.

Checking Premium access…

Explore Premium

Live preview

Take a moment to read at your own pace. Choose the text size and spacing that feel comfortable for you.

Pause after each idea, then explain it in your own words before moving on.

Narrower lines take effect when the screen has room.

Enlarged diagram

Choose the final order before multiplying

A coefficient can receive contributions from several pairs of terms. To expand e^x cos 2x through x³, use

e^x = 1 + x + x²/2 + x³/6 + …, cos 2x = 1-2x² + ….

The quadratic coefficient is 1/2-2 = -3/2. The cubic coefficient combines (x³/6) · 1 with x · (-2x²), giving 1/6-2 = -11/6. Hence

e^x cos 2x = 1 + x-(3/2)x²-(11/6)x³ + ….

Multiplying only terms with the same degree would miss those mixed contributions. Retain every pair whose degrees add to a requested power. Higher-degree terms cannot contribute to these lower-degree coefficients in this product.

Check your understanding 1 Include the mixed contribution

Find terms through x³ in e^2x cos x. Show which terms contribute to the cubic coefficient, and explain why a term of degree four in either factor is unnecessary for this product.

Show answer

Use (1 + 2x + 2x² + (4/3)x³ + …)(1-x²/2 + …). The result is 1 + 2x + (3/2)x² + (1/3)x³ + …. The cubic coefficient is 4/3 + 2(-1/2) = 1/3. With only nonnegative powers in these factors, a fourth-degree term cannot contribute to a coefficient through degree three.

Substitution also changes powers and convergence conditions. For a composition such as ln(1 + 2x), transform the input in each retained term and in the original logarithm-series interval. If several expansions are combined, use their common valid interval before making a series-equality claim.

Logarithm subtraction can expose a symmetry

For |x| < 1, both 1 + x and 1-x are positive, so

ln((1 + x)/(1-x)) = ln(1 + x)- ln(1-x).

Substitute into the two standard series. The linear, cubic and fifth-degree terms add, while the even-degree terms cancel:

ln((1 + x)/(1-x)) = 2(x + x³/3 + x⁵/5 + …), |x| < 1.

The function is odd: replacing x by -x reverses the logarithm’s sign. That is an independent check on the absence of even powers. At either endpoint one logarithm is undefined, so neither endpoint belongs to this combined interval.

Check your understanding 2 Transform every retained odd power

Find the first three nonzero terms of h(x) = ln [(1 + 2x)/(1-2x)] and its real convergence interval. Explain why replacing only the first x by 2x gives wrong higher coefficients. Is the real function defined at x = 0.6?

Show answer

Substitution throughout gives h(x) = 4x + (16/3)x³ + (64/5)x⁵ + …, with |2x| < 1, or -1/2 < x < 1/2. The cubic input contributes (2x)³, and the fifth contributes (2x)⁵; both change their coefficients.

At x = 0.6, the ratio (1 + 2x)/(1-2x) is negative, so its real logarithm is undefined. A finite polynomial evaluated there would not restore that missing function value.

Repeated differentiation gives the first few terms

For y = sec x near zero, y(0) = 1 and y' = y tan x, so y'(0) = 0. Differentiating again and using tan² x = sec² x-1 gives

y'' = y tan² x + y sec² x = 2y³-y.

Thus y''(0) = 1. Two more differentiations give

y⁽³⁾ = (6y²-1)y',
y⁽⁴⁾ = 12y(y')² + (6y²-1)y''.

At zero these are 0 and 5. Dividing the derivative values by their factorials yields

sec x = 1 + x²/2 + 5x⁴/24 + …

locally. The odd powers vanish consistently with the function being even. These few derivatives determine the displayed terms; they do not establish a convergence interval merely by being finite.

Coefficient matching gives a different check. Write sec x = 1 + ax² + bx⁴ + … and multiply by cos x = 1-x²/2 + x⁴/24 + …. Since the product is one, its quadratic and fourth-degree coefficients must be zero:

a-1/2 = 0, b-a/2 + 1/24 = 0.

These give a = 1/2 and b = 5/24, agreeing with repeated differentiation. This check uses the original reciprocal relationship, rather than just comparing the appearance of coefficients.

Check your understanding 3 Turn derivative values into polynomial coefficients

For y = ln(cos x) near zero, start with y' = - tan x and use further differentiation to find its first two nonzero Maclaurin terms. State why the real function requires a positive cosine and check your coefficient factorials.

Show answer

We have y'' = - sec² x, y⁽³⁾ = -2 sec² x tan x and y⁽⁴⁾ = -4 sec² x tan² x-2 sec⁴ x. At zero, y = 0, y' = 0, y'' = -1, y⁽³⁾ = 0 and y⁽⁴⁾ = -2. Thus

ln(cos x) = -x²/2-x⁴/12 + …

near zero. The fourth-degree coefficient is -2/4! = -1/12, not -2. The logarithm needs cos x > 0, which holds on -π/2 < x < π/2 around zero. This real-domain statement does not by itself prove a full series convergence interval.

An implicit relationship supplies derivative values

Suppose y³ + y² + y = x²-2x on the branch through (0,0). Differentiating the entire relationship gives

(3y² + 2y + 1)y' = 2x-2,

so y'(0) = -2. Differentiating again,

(6y + 2)(y')² + (3y² + 2y + 1)y'' = 2.

At (0,0) this gives 2(-2)² + y''(0) = 2, hence y''(0) = -6. A third differentiation gives

6(y')³ + 3(6y + 2)y'y'' + (3y² + 2y + 1)y⁽³⁾ = 0.

Therefore 6(-2)³ + 3(2)(-2)(-6) + y⁽³⁾(0) = 0, giving y⁽³⁾(0) = -24. The resulting local expansion is

y = -2x-3x²-4x³ + ….

The branch point supplies the starting y-value, and the derivative coefficient there is nonzero, so each displayed derivative can be obtained. Divide by the factorials before writing the polynomial. Substituting -2x-3x²-4x³ into the original equation matches the coefficients through x³ but leaves a term -11x⁴ and higher powers: it is not the exact curve.

Try it yourself 1

Approximate an implicitly defined value

Minimal support

Problem

A local branch satisfies (1 + y)e^y = 1 + x and passes through (0,0). Find its Maclaurin terms through x³ by repeated implicit differentiation. Verify the coefficients by substituting a cubic polynomial into the original relationship and using the exponential series. Use your polynomial to estimate y at x = 0.1, then compare its left-hand side with 1.1. Explain what this check establishes about the approximation.

Write your answer, then compare it with the solution

Hints

Hint 1

Differentiate the whole y-dependent product

Every occurrence of y changes with x. After each differentiation, evaluate at the given point using the derivatives already found. For the coefficient check, decide which powers of y can affect terms through x³ near this branch point.

Show full solution
  1. Differentiate through the implicit relationship

    Method

    Keep the product and chain-rule contributions together.

    Reason

    The rate of change of both factors depends on y'.

    Working

    Answer

    The first derivative is e^y(y + 2)y' = 1, so y'(0) = 1/2. Differentiating again gives e^y(y + 3)(y')² + e^y(y + 2)y'' = 0. At zero, 3/4 + 2y''(0) = 0, hence y''(0) = -3/8.
  2. Obtain the cubic coefficient

    Method

    Differentiate the second-derivative relationship once more.

    Reason

    The cubic coefficient needs the third derivative divided by 3!.

    Working

    Answer

    The third derivative equation is e^y(y + 4)(y')³ + 3e^y(y + 3)y'y'' + e^y(y + 2)y⁽³⁾ = 0. At zero it gives 1/2-27/16 + 2y⁽³⁾(0) = 0, so y⁽³⁾(0) = 19/32. Thus y = x/2-(3/16)x² + (19/192)x³ + … locally.
  3. Check coefficients in the original equation

    Method

    Expand the left-hand side in powers of y, then substitute y = ax + bx² + cx³.

    Reason

    Agreement through the requested order checks the derivative calculation by another method.

    Working

    Answer

    Through cubic order, (1 + y)e^y = 1 + 2y + (3/2)y² + (2/3)y³ + …. Matching 1 + x gives 2a = 1, 2b + (3/2)a² = 0 and 2c + 3ab + (2/3)a³ = 0. These give a = 1/2, b = -3/16, c = 19/192, agreeing with the derivative method.
  4. Interpret the numerical estimate

    Method

    Evaluate the polynomial and test it in the original relationship.

    Reason

    A small residual supports a local approximation without making the finite polynomial an exact solution.

    Working

    Answer

    At x = 0.1, the polynomial gives y ≈ 0.0482239583. Substitution gives (1 + y)e^y-1.1 ≈ 1.21 × 10⁻⁵ before rounding. The residual is nonzero, so the estimated point does not lie exactly on the implicit curve. Its small size is a consistency check on this local approximation. Matching three coefficients does not establish a global convergence interval or guarantee a requested number of correct decimal places.

Keep track of this lesson

Mark the lesson done when you have worked through it.

Lesson progress is optional and kept on this device.

Your lesson mark records your own study. Checks are kept separately in My Learning.