Power, chain, product and quotient rules

Choose differentiation rules from the expression structure, retain real domains, and verify combined derivatives by another form.

More
Reading settingsKeep track of this lesson

Read offline with Premium

Save lessons and their figures on this device to read without an internet connection. Offline saving is included with Premium.

Connect at least once every 30 days to confirm Premium. Topic checks, coaching and sync need a connection.

Find this activity in your course
On this page

Reading settings

Colour theme, text size, line spacing and reading width for your lessons.

Colour theme
Text size
Line spacing
Reading width
Revision Mode

Keep just the revision notes by hiding embedded questions and activities, including worked examples. Your choice follows your account across both subjects and devices. Turn off to show the full lesson again.

Checking Premium access…

Explore Premium

Live preview

Take a moment to read at your own pace. Choose the text size and spacing that feel comfortable for you.

Pause after each idea, then explain it in your own words before moving on.

Narrower lines take effect when the screen has room.

Enlarged diagram

Begin with the function’s real domain

Differentiation describes local change at an allowed input. Before choosing a rule, record where the original real function exists and where a finite derivative can exist. A readable derivative formula cannot restore an excluded input.

For y = xⁿ, the power rule gives dy/dx = nxⁿ⁻¹ wherever the real function is differentiable. Constants differentiate to zero; constant multiples, sums and differences differentiate term by term.

For example, on x > 0,

y = 3x⁴-2/x + 5 square root of x = 3x⁴-2x⁻¹ + 5x^(1/2),

so

dy/(dx) = 12x³ + 2x⁻² + (5/2)x^(-1/2).

The reciprocal excludes zero, and the square root requires a nonnegative input. Together they give the original domain x > 0. Rewriting with powers helps the calculation but does not remove those conditions.

Different functions can fail to have a finite derivative for different reasons. The function 1/x has no point at zero. The function square root of x has a point at zero, but no finite tangent gradient there. The real cube-root function cube root of x exists for every real x, with derivative 1/(3x^(2/3)) for x ≠ 0; that derivative is not finite at zero either. For negative x in this last expression, x^(2/3) = (cube root of x)².

A chain combines an outer and an inner change

For y = f(u) with u = g(x), the chain rule is

dy/(dx) = (dy/(du))du/(dx) = f'(g(x))g'(x),

where the required functions and derivatives exist. The outer derivative is evaluated at the inner output; the inner derivative tells how quickly that input changes with x.

For y = (3x² + 1)⁵, put u = 3x² + 1. Then dy/du = 5u⁴ and du/dx = 6x, giving

dy/(dx) = 30x(3x² + 1)⁴.

Omitting 6x treats the inner input as if it changed at unit rate. At x = 0, the inner rate is zero and the derivative is zero, even though the original function value is one.

Check your understanding 1 Differentiate the inside too

For y = square root of (2x + 5), state the maximal real domain, find the derivative where it is finite, and evaluate it at x = 2. What happens at the boundary input?

Show answer

The function requires 2x + 5 ≥ 0, so its domain is [-5/2,∞). For x > -5/2, the chain rule gives y' = (1/2)(2x + 5)^(-1/2) · 2 = 1/square root of (2x + 5). At x = 2, this is 1/3.

At x = -5/2, the function value is zero, but the derivative is not finite. The derivative’s domain is therefore smaller than the function’s domain. The inner derivative cancels the numerical half; it still has to be included.

The conditions of the rule matter when the inner output reaches a boundary of the outer function. A zero inner derivative cannot simply be multiplied by an undefined outer derivative.

Check your understanding 2 A square root does not undo every square

For y = square root of x² on the real line, identify the function and give its derivative on each side of zero. Does it have a derivative at zero? Explain why replacing it by x gives a wrong answer for negative inputs.

Show answer

The function is |x|: it equals x for x ≥ 0 and -x for x < 0. Its derivative is 1 for x > 0 and -1 for x < 0. At zero, the right and left gradients disagree, so the function is not differentiable there.

For nonzero x, the chain calculation gives x/square root of x² = x/|x|, agreeing with those two pieces. At zero it gives no derivative. The function itself still exists there; this is a corner, not a removed input.

A product has two changing contributions

For y = u(x)v(x),

y' = u'v + uv'.

Each factor changes while the other supplies its current value. Differentiating both and multiplying u'v' misses those two contributions.

For y = (x² + 1)(x³-2),

y' = 2x(x³-2) + 3x²(x² + 1).

An alternative is to expand first: y = x⁵ + x³-2x²-2, so y' = 5x⁴ + 3x²-4x. Expanding the product-rule result gives the same derivative. At x = 1, both correct forms give 4, whereas the incorrect product u'v' = 6x³ would give 6.

Not every expression needs the product rule. A constant multiple such as 7x³ differentiates to 21x² directly; the constant’s derivative contributes zero if you choose to write the product rule out.

A quotient keeps its denominator condition

Write u = yv and apply the product rule: u' = y'v + yv'. Substituting y = u/v and rearranging gives

y' = (u'v-uv')/v², v ≠ 0.

The subtraction applies to the whole uv' product. The result is not u'/v', and the original denominator condition remains part of the answer.

For y = (x² + 1)/(x-1),

y' = (2x(x-1)-(x² + 1))/((x-1)²) = (x²-2x-1)/((x-1)²), x ≠ 1.

Division provides another method: y = x + 1 + 2/(x-1) on the same domain, so y' = 1-2/(x-1)². Combining that expression over a common denominator recovers the quotient-rule result. Either form is valid; simplifying never fills an original hole or pole.

Check your understanding 3 Subtract the complete product

Differentiate y = (x² + 3)/(2x-1) and state its domain. A proposed numerator after applying the quotient rule is 2x(2x-1)-2x² + 6. Identify the error and check your derivative at x = 1.

Show answer

The domain excludes x = 1/2. The correct numerator is 2x(2x-1)-2(x² + 3), so

y' = (2x²-2x-6)/((2x-1)²), x ≠ 1/2.

The proposed numerator failed to subtract the constant part of the complete product: -2(x² + 3) = -2x²-6, not -2x² + 6. At x = 1, the correct derivative is -6.

Choose the structure before simplifying

Several rules may be needed in one expression. For y = x² square root of (2x + 1), the outer structure is a product, and one factor is itself a composition. On x > -1/2,

y' = 2x square root of (2x + 1) + x²/(square root of (2x + 1)) = (x(5x + 2))/(square root of (2x + 1)).

The original function also exists at x = -1/2, but does not have a finite derivative there. Applying only the power rule to the visible square root would miss the inner factor; differentiating only one factor would miss part of the product’s change.

Try it yourself 1

Check all the zero gradients

Minimal support

Problem

A function is m(x) = (x²-1)²/(x² + 1). Find its real domain and differentiate it, showing where each rule is used. Verify your derivative by first rewriting the original function as x²-3 + 4/(x² + 1). Find every real input with zero gradient. A claim lists only x = ±1 because those make the original numerator zero: decide whether it is complete.

Write your answer, then compare it with the solution

Hints

Hint 1

Keep the function and its derivative separate

Track the outer quotient and the squared inner expression. When solving for a zero gradient, check every factor of the derivative rather than dividing away a possible zero.

Show full solution
  1. Differentiate the grouped expression

    Method

    Use the chain rule for the numerator within the quotient rule.

    Reason

    The squared numerator and the denominator both change with x.

    Working

    Answer

    The denominator x² + 1 is positive for every real x, so the domain is R. The numerator derivative is 4x(x²-1). Thus m' = [4x(x²-1)(x² + 1)-2x(x²-1)²]/(x² + 1)² = 2x(x²-1)(x² + 3)/(x² + 1)².
  2. Verify through a different form

    Method

    Differentiate x²-3 + 4(x² + 1)⁻¹.

    Reason

    Equivalent forms on the original domain must give the same derivative.

    Working

    Answer

    This gives m' = 2x-8x/(x² + 1)². Combining the terms yields 2x[(x² + 1)²-4]/(x² + 1)², which factors into the first result.
  3. Retain every allowed zero-gradient input

    Method

    Set the factored numerator of the derivative equal to zero.

    Reason

    The derivative, not the original function value, determines the tangent gradient.

    Working

    Answer

    The factor x² + 3 cannot be zero for real x, and the denominator never vanishes. The complete set is x = -1,0,1. The claim omitted 0, where m(0) = 1 but m'(0) = 0. Dividing the derivative equation by x would lose this valid input.

Record the original domain, identify the expression’s outer structure, then follow every changing inner part. Keep the full grouping of products and quotients. Use an independent algebraic form or a direct value check where it can expose a missing factor or sign.

Keep track of this lesson

Mark the lesson done when you have worked through it.

Lesson progress is optional and kept on this device.

Your lesson mark records your own study. Checks are kept separately in My Learning.